View all Archives -
Environment and Development »
Forestry for Sustainable Rural Development
Institutional Change and New
Collaborative Relationships
Efforts
to secure changes in land tenure that give more rights to
forest-dependent people and changes in management practices that
benefit local users depend upon transformations in the institutions
charged with implementing community forestry. Specifically, forest
departments must develop their capacity to decentralize in order to
achieve a shift in power and authority to local users. Because
formal authority and jurisdiction over public forest lands
currently rests with government forest departments, a primary
strategy of community forestry programs is to encourage
institutional and policy changes within forest departments to
increase the scope of local empowerment. A corollary strategy is to
strengthen the capacity of NGOs and research institutions to
undertake new roles in support of people-oriented forest
management.
These
strategies rest on the view that each sector of society has a
distinctive institutional competence to contribute to community
forestry. Local organizations manage day-to-day activities and
negotiate with external actors such as government forest
departments, businesses, and NGOs. Governments can provide
resources and formal authority to local organizations; NGOs help
strengthen local organizations and mediate between government and
communities; and research organizations generate knowledge and
methods needed in planning and in bringing about institutional
change. The initiatives supported by the Foundation have sought to
orient these distinctive capacities toward community-based
management. Support to government agencies has sought to create
processes for developing programs and policies that
institutionalize people-oriented approaches. NGOs have learned to
work with governments to effect policy and structural change, and
with communities to provide technical assistance and organizing
skills. Support to universities and research institutes has enabled
them to develop participatory methods and provide project analysis
and documentation. The development of institutional capacity in
each of these sectors helps to ensure the long-term viability of
community forestry.
One theme
that runs through efforts to achieve institutional transformation
is the importance of informal and formal relations among government
agencies, universities, NGOs, and communities. Collaborations
strengthen the institutional base of